The decade of the CIVETS

The past decade was all about the BRICs, the massive economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China, which kicked off at the beginning of the new century, boomed and are now slowing like the rest of the developed world. Taking their place is a new group of fast-rising economies promising businesses outsized returns.

The next decade could belong to the CIVETS – Colombia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Egypt, Turkey and South Africa – whose rising middle class, young populations and rapid growth rates make the BRICs look dull in comparison.

“The BRICs are yesterday’s news,” said Professor Jerry Haar, director of the Pino Global Entrepreneurship Center at Florida International University in Miami. Hardly emerging economies anymore – China is the world’s second largest economy and Brazil will take seventh place this year – that their pace would slow down was inevitable.

Now more connected by trade to the developed economies, the BRICs are feeling the same slowdown effects as the developed economies.  And, in the case of China and Brazil, they are also wrestling with the strains of their rapid ascensions. Real estate bubbles, currency control issues and hyper-wage inflation are sending global companies elsewhere for growth.

Brazil stumbled in 2012, as did China, which is well off its double-digit growth rates of the past decade. Russia, which grew its economy 3.4% in 2012 — surpassing Brazil — can’t kick its dependency on oil exports. India is also slowing from its 2010 growth pace of 9.6%.

The CIVETS, meanwhile, are at the lift-off point. The six countries in the group are posting growth rates higher than 5% — with the exception of Egypt and South Africa – and trending upwards.  Lacking the size and heft of the BRICs, these upstarts nevertheless offer a more dynamic population base, with the average age being 27, soaring domestic consumption and more diverse opportunities for businesses seeking international expansion.

The roads into newly emerging markets are never easily navigated, however, and high growth comes with high risk. With data from the World Bank Doing Business 2012 report and the Economist Intelligence Unit, we present a guide to the CIVETS: The highs, the lows and what you need to know:

Cartagena, Colombia | Photo: Jon SpaullCOLOMBIA

By the numbers
GDP:  5.8% (2011); 4.9% (2012)
FDI: $14.8 billion (up from $6.9 billion in 2010); $16B (2012)

Highs

A number of key reforms under President Juan Manuel Santos are taking place, including tackling security issues and rebuilding the country’s decrepit infrastructure. The government passed a 10-year, $55 billion infrastructure investment plan, about half of which will come from private-sector investment.

Colombia moved up five points on the World Bank Doing Business 2012 rankings, from 47th to 42nd spot, as a result of three improvements: It has reduced the cost of starting a business by eliminating the upfront payment of a commercial license fee; it has introduced an electronic filing system for corporate taxes; and has simplified the process around resolving insolvencies.

Lows

According to the EIU’s survey of global businesses, security remains the No. 1 risk to doing business in Colombia. Other key concerns are the complexity of taxes and poor infrastructure. And, as in other Latin American nations, corruption and inefficiency are endemic in Colombia.

Need to know

Overall, the Latin American country of 46 million people has come a long way from the years when insecurity kept investors away and led to talent fleeing the country. The government is winning the war with the FARC guerillas, whose position has considerably weakened.

While focused on fixing internal problems, Colombia is also looking outward, signing an ambitious round of free-trade agreements with developed countries, including the United States. The U.S. pact goes into effect May 15. Key opportunities for businesses are in the areas of consumer goods, conventional and alternative energy, mining and infrastructure construction.

Jalan Jend Sudirman-Senayan, Indonesia | Photo: Martin WestlakeINDONESIA

By the numbers
GDP 6.46% (2011); 5.9% (2012)
FDI $18.18 billion (2011); $17B (2012); $20B (2013)

Highs

The big story in Indonesia is its expanding middle class. Expected to triple in size by 2014, the country is being touted as the next great boom market in Asia, after China and India. Indonesia’s increasingly confident consumers have passed $3,000 GDP per capita, the benchmark beyond which people start to have real money to spend. As a result, foreign direct investment is pouring into Indonesia. It jumped 30% to a record $5.6 billion in the first three months of the year, and is showing no signs of slowing. In 2013, FDI is forecast to reach $20 billion

Lows

Indonesia declined a few notches on the World Bank’s Doing Business 2012 ranking, and now sits at 129th spot.  Some of the roadblocks for businesses include such basics as the length of time it takes to get electricity: an average of 108 days.  According to the EIU, top concerns for global businesses are government effectiveness, regulatory issues and infrastructure. Lack of a skilled workforce is also a problem in Indonesia.

Need to know

Indonesia has become a hot prospect for foreign businesses because of the sheer number of potential consumers. With 230 million people, it is the fourth-most populous country in the world. Wealth is rising, along with demand for luxury goods.

One worrisome trend is the government’s recent shift to protectionist policies.  For example, foreign investors must now divest themselves of 51% of ownership in local mines to local entities by the 10th year of operation. Indonesia’s mining sector is one of the top recipients of FDI, followed by transportation and telecommunications.

Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam | Photo: Peter StuckingsVIETNAM

By the numbers
GDP 5.9% (2011); 5.7% (2012); 7.0% (2013)
FDI $7.9 billion (2011); $8.05B (2012); $11.06B (2013)

Highs

According to the EIU, security risks are a non-issue in the Communist country, however, corruption is endemic and regulatory systems are opaque and a challenge to navigate. “Vietnam’s membership in the World Trade Organization, which took effect in early 2007, has resulted in measures to liberalize trade and investment, and these will serve to make the operating environment more predictable,” says the EIU’s country report on Vietnam.

Lows

Vietnam also dropped on the World Bank’s Doing Business 2012 ranking, to 98th spot, from 90th the previous year. The country did make one notable improvement, in the area of strengthening investor protection, by demanding higher standards of accountability by company directors.

Need to know

Like other Asian nations, Vietnam is seeing a growing middle class now able to afford the purchase of more consumer goods and luxury items.  Of course, that means wages are also rising. Still, Vietnam wages are 35-45% cheaper than China’s, and the country is attracting foreign manufacturers turned off by rising costs in China.

Vietnam’s Communist Party has a strong grip on the country, which means a stable political environment. The government is also showing an increasingly open attitude to foreign investment and business-friendly policies, including tax breaks for priority industries such as high-tech, education and healthcare.

Downtown Cairo, Egypt | Photo: Hisham IbrahimEGYPT

By the numbers
GDP 1.78% (2011); 1.6% (2012); 5.20% (2013)
FDI $0.66 billion (2011); $3.15B (2012); $6.93B (2013)

Highs

With a young, aspiring population, and a relatively benign transition from the corrupt rule of President Hosni Mubarak compared with other Arab Spring uprisings, Egypt is poised to embark on a period of fast growth.

Lows

Egypt’s political instability as it transitions to a democracy remains high. The outcome of the year-long election is far from certain, and this has led to a major drop off in foreign investment. Egypt’s economy is virtually at a standstill as businesses wait licensing, approvals and other direction from a dismantled government.

Need to know

Once Egypt’s political situation stabilizes following the presidential elections, a more motivated diaspora is expected to drive dramatic economic growth. The country’s youth bulge is being eyed by Western businesses as a potentially lucrative market for consumer goods.  As well, expectations are for massive government spending to live up to election promises.

Istanbul, Turkey | Photo: Salvator BarkiTURKEY

By the numbers
GDP 7.9% (2011); 3.5% (2012)
FDI $15.73 billion (2011); $15B (2012); $18.5B (2013)

Highs

Straddling the Middle East and Europe, Turkey has been a shining star in both worlds. It is one of the few European economies seeing growth, and one of the few politically stable Middle Eastern countries.

Turkey has moved up on the World Bank’s Doing Business 2012 ranking, to 71st spot,  thanks to improvements in the length of time it takes to start a business (6 days), and by reducing corporate taxes by lowering social security contributions.

Lows

According to the EIU, the top concern for global businesses is government effectiveness. Although Turkey’s regulatory environment has improved, its legal process is slow and unpredictable.

Need to know

Turkey has enjoyed a coming out period economically as well as politically as it asserts itself on the diplomatic scene in the Middle East. The question now is whether it can sustain its strong position. Rapid economic growth is slowing in Turkey, and some strains are showing on its political front. Still, it remains a very attractive market for businesses with its access to European and the Middle Eastern markets, as well as a young, educated, upper middle-income domestic population. Key areas of opportunity include consumer goods, technology and energy.

Cape Town, South Africa | Photo: Robin SmithSOUTH AFRICA

By the numbers
GDP 3.1% (2011); 2.3% (2012); 3.7% (2013)
FDI $5.62 billion (2011); $4B (2012); $5.24B (2013)

Highs

The EIU report on South Africa is positive and notes a fairly good physical infrastructure, sound macroeconomic policy, developed legal and taxation systems and a strong civil society. The country also rates high on the World Bank’s Doing Business 2012 rankings, in number 35 spot, with improvements over the past year in the length of time to start a business (19 days), resolving insolvencies and to rules around registering property.

Lows

South Africa’s export economy has been hit by the slowdowns in Europe and the United States. According to the EIU, it also suffers from some structural issues that hinder growth, such as rigid labor markets and high crime levels. The country is currently struggling with a 23.9% unemployment rate.

Need to know

As one of the wealthier and more advanced African economies, South Africa is a good stepping stone to the continent for businesses.  Foreign companies are looking to South Africa as a test market for rolling out products and services to the region, as well as a source of partners to ease their expansion into other African nations.

The country’s young and modern population – average age is 19 — has become a hot prospect for Western consumer goods companies, including retailers such as Gap Inc. and Wal-Mart. Opportunities for businesses are also expected to take off in areas such as construction and transportation. The ANC government under President Jacob Zuma has announced a $39 billion infrastructure spending program to boost private-sector investment and job creation.

We recommend

Latest Comments

Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Anonymous #OPs
Anonymous #OPs that is kinda sad , considering that California is the WORLDS 8th largest economy. That says a whole lot.
  • 2013-03-10 20:20:57
Richard Keech
Richard Keech The Philippines should be included on that list. It is the twelfth most populous country in the world, larger than any on the list save Indonesia, and the government of that nation has projected 2013 growth will be in the range of 6.7%.
  • 2013-02-03 01:50:01
Gary Tucker
Gary Tucker Using the other major theme of B Without B of the value of strategic M & A among companies to leverage strengths by individual companies to be shared by another for the common whole I propose a few political mergers in this category that might help more than a few short term possibilities become even more long term potential success stories. Example such as Columbia and Panama joining as one country. Even better a return to the original Gran Columbia but reality is paramount. Each country would greatly enhance the combined countries by bringing individual expertise in financial matters as well as natural resource wealth to create a much more likely matured investment climate for both. The second would be a combined Egypt, Libya and Tunisia, (with capital in say Bayda Libya, would bring population, energy revenue and large educated middle class to a combined goal of jobs and social equality. The more the long term powers that be were negotiating with even more factions the more likely compromises for the good of all could be achieved. This one has the potential to create not only an economic explosion but also a trend to region pairings across the Arab world the could only work to everyone's benefit long term. For Turkey I see a push not so much towards Europe or the Middle East as to a joint common market around the Black sea of Turkey, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia and Uzbekistan. A free trade zone here would really bring demand into contact with expanding production and the growth factor even greater than Turkey alone. Each brings resources or demand on a giant scale to the need of the others in the zone. For Indonesia a trade zone adding Bangladesh would almost force Indonesia to focus on how bad Bangladesh is and how restructuring Indonesia would be brought more quickly into prospective. Thus better able to be of help and thrive from such a joint marketing arrangement. As for South Africa I would not suggest any trade pacts with others as much as South Africa taking the regional lead in pushing to create other trade blocks such as the East African Union (with South Sudan) to fruition. These more advanced trading blocks would in turn do nothing if not make South Africa's leadership in the gateway to Africa that much more important and viable to companies worldwide. There are more than a few other country groupings that are ripe for such unified goals and economic sharing to be created throughout Africa. For Vietnam the same could be said of an expanded role for the Mekong River joint development. Finally the one possibility under this two is better than one scenario, a combined Mexico and Cuba, with the combined Capitol in Havana and Mexico City just being the largest urban center of the country would be a startling new member to join the CIVITS. For Havana to jump to the capital of the largest and perhaps most dynamic Spanish speaking country in the world, in one fail swoop would be a lasting legacy for all Cubans. The Cuban military's ability to perhaps more quickly end the drug strife in Mexico would be also a plus. The desire for Cubans to move to Mexico and Mexicans to move to Cuba would be a major new dynamic in cross border options for both countries. FInally, for the Combined Mexico with Havana as it's capital would rank quite closely with Russia in population and economic potential for the coming future. This would indeed be sweet revenge for a retired Castro brothers in an elder statesmen role at the completion of the merger. To achieve a semblance of parity with Russia in such a quick and decisive manner could not help but to be an incentive to at least consider such a scenario. Just some thoughts to consider. While cross border M & A of the largest of corporate companies is almost a forgone thought to many, the idea of finding two or more countries that really would be better off if joined as one has become an idea lost in the file of "things like that just do not happen."
  • 2012-12-13 09:01:42

Showing all Comments

Sort by:
  • Oldest
  • Newest
okay ilkiz
okay ilkiz I agree on Indonesia, Turkey and S. Africa, where middle class of these countries has been growing very fast, demand for better products and services are very high, and average GDP has been increasing above 5 percent each year in the past 8- 10 yrs as well as the purchasing power which offers International Companies a great growth potential and promising future in many market segments. However, Egypt and Vietnam are still struggling with the nationalist, political mindset, suffering from economic constraints, inconsistencies, poor infrastructure and slow governmental reaction to new investments.
  • 2012-11-22 19:43:49
Gary Tucker
Gary Tucker Using the other major theme of B Without B of the value of strategic M & A among companies to leverage strengths by individual companies to be shared by another for the common whole I propose a few political mergers in this category that might help more than a few short term possibilities become even more long term potential success stories. Example such as Columbia and Panama joining as one country. Even better a return to the original Gran Columbia but reality is paramount. Each country would greatly enhance the combined countries by bringing individual expertise in financial matters as well as natural resource wealth to create a much more likely matured investment climate for both. The second would be a combined Egypt, Libya and Tunisia, (with capital in say Bayda Libya, would bring population, energy revenue and large educated middle class to a combined goal of jobs and social equality. The more the long term powers that be were negotiating with even more factions the more likely compromises for the good of all could be achieved. This one has the potential to create not only an economic explosion but also a trend to region pairings across the Arab world the could only work to everyone's benefit long term. For Turkey I see a push not so much towards Europe or the Middle East as to a joint common market around the Black sea of Turkey, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia and Uzbekistan. A free trade zone here would really bring demand into contact with expanding production and the growth factor even greater than Turkey alone. Each brings resources or demand on a giant scale to the need of the others in the zone. For Indonesia a trade zone adding Bangladesh would almost force Indonesia to focus on how bad Bangladesh is and how restructuring Indonesia would be brought more quickly into prospective. Thus better able to be of help and thrive from such a joint marketing arrangement. As for South Africa I would not suggest any trade pacts with others as much as South Africa taking the regional lead in pushing to create other trade blocks such as the East African Union (with South Sudan) to fruition. These more advanced trading blocks would in turn do nothing if not make South Africa's leadership in the gateway to Africa that much more important and viable to companies worldwide. There are more than a few other country groupings that are ripe for such unified goals and economic sharing to be created throughout Africa. For Vietnam the same could be said of an expanded role for the Mekong River joint development. Finally the one possibility under this two is better than one scenario, a combined Mexico and Cuba, with the combined Capitol in Havana and Mexico City just being the largest urban center of the country would be a startling new member to join the CIVITS. For Havana to jump to the capital of the largest and perhaps most dynamic Spanish speaking country in the world, in one fail swoop would be a lasting legacy for all Cubans. The Cuban military's ability to perhaps more quickly end the drug strife in Mexico would be also a plus. The desire for Cubans to move to Mexico and Mexicans to move to Cuba would be a major new dynamic in cross border options for both countries. FInally, for the Combined Mexico with Havana as it's capital would rank quite closely with Russia in population and economic potential for the coming future. This would indeed be sweet revenge for a retired Castro brothers in an elder statesmen role at the completion of the merger. To achieve a semblance of parity with Russia in such a quick and decisive manner could not help but to be an incentive to at least consider such a scenario. Just some thoughts to consider. While cross border M & A of the largest of corporate companies is almost a forgone thought to many, the idea of finding two or more countries that really would be better off if joined as one has become an idea lost in the file of "things like that just do not happen."
  • 2012-12-13 09:01:42
Richard Keech
Richard Keech The Philippines should be included on that list. It is the twelfth most populous country in the world, larger than any on the list save Indonesia, and the government of that nation has projected 2013 growth will be in the range of 6.7%.
  • 2013-02-03 01:50:01
Anonymous #OPs
Anonymous #OPs that is kinda sad , considering that California is the WORLDS 8th largest economy. That says a whole lot.
  • 2013-03-10 20:20:57