Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is quietly adopting an aggressive new trade strategy designed to be a “counterweight” to what it sees as steps by its largest trading partner — the United States — to control regional free trade.

Stephen Harper and Hu Jintao
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper (L) is
greeted by Chinese President Hu Jintao before
their meeting on February 9, 2012 in Beijing, China
Photo: Getty Images

While on an official visit to China this week, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao negotiated a ream of trade agreements. These included everything from sharing pandas to selling Saskatoon’s uranium yellowcake to China for its nuclear energy program. As well, Canada and China signed a foreign investment and protection agreement designed to protect investments in each other’s country.

Although Canadian officials deny these are the first steps toward an all-out free trade agreement with China, the prospects are enough to send a loud message to the United States: They can do their own deals, thank-you very much.

Although two-way trade between Canada and the United States is still the world’s largest – roughly about $1 million a minute – China is becoming one of Canada’s emerging trading partners. Two-way trade is about C$58 billion a year, with C$45 million coming from China and C$13 billion leaving Canada for China, mostly in agricultural products.

While reluctant to say so, the U.S. administration is becoming increasingly nervous about the growing strength of China, and its new ties to countries like Canada. In sum, America fears it is being bypassed and losing the trade and economic clout it once had — something it was trying to re-establish through the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).

With the collapse of the Doha Round global trade talks among 153 countries in the World Trade Organization, many countries have been actively pursing bilateral or regional trade pacts. The latest, and one of the largest, is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) among nine Asian and South American countries, including the United States. Other countries in TPP include Australia, Brunei, Chile, Malaysia, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam.

Canada, Japan and Mexico have asked to join. But Canada is reluctant to negotiate the so-called “entrance fee” the U.S. and other countries are demanding. Mostly, that involves Canada opening up its supply management system for dairy and poultry to direct import competition.

Both the U.S. and New Zealand, a major dairy producer, are demanding that Canada, as well as Japan, offer up its protected agricultural industries to foreign competition (Japan offers protection for its rice producers).

Back in Beijing, Canadian Trade Minister Ed Fast commented on the deals with China: “Our end game is to deepen our trade relationship in one of our key priority markets.”

But according to one Canadian trade official, the real driver for Canada is a worry that the U.S. will try to “keep us out of the [Trans-Pacific Partnership].”

Canada is also looking for alternatives for its vast oil sands reserves after the refusal by President Barack Obama to approve the 1,600-mile Keystone XL pipeline between Alberta and refineries in the U.S. Gulf Coast. The pipeline, which would run through Montana, South Dakota and Nebraska, would cost about $13 billion.

In the meantime, Canada is moving ahead with another pipeline from Alberta’s oil sands to its West Coast. Called the Northern Gateway pipeline, it would move about 525,000 barrels a day to Kitimat, British Columbia, to be shipped onto major Asian markets such as China.

“China needs our resources,” said a Canadian trade official, noting that China has already made capital investments in Alberta’s oil sands.

Besides stepping up trade relations with China, Canada is also making nice with TPP members Singapore, Brunei and Malaysia. Those countries are the next stops for Trade Minister Ed Fast on his swing through Asia.

“We are on the sharp edge of a strategic sword,” said one Canadian trade official.

We recommend

Latest Comments

Please sign in or sign up to leave a comment.
Kelan Smith
Kelan Smith It is important to consider that Canada is not the “51st state”, nor is it “America Junior”, as many folks in the United States have come to think of it. We have become accustomed to Canada serving US economic and political interests, however, I do believe that as the United States’ global economic position evens out with the rest of the world (and as Canada’s does as well), we will see Canada acting in an increasingly independent fashion. Canada has the natural resources to be an incredibly powerful country due to their huge tracts of land and sparse population density – they are just now beginning to capitalize on that fact from an international export standpoint as China begins to wheel-and-deal with them, without US involvement. The US is partly to blame for Canada going ahead and dealing with China alone in an economic capacity. The US (big brother) left Canada (little brother) out of the Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership (TPP), so we should not be so surprised that while the US was at their TPP club meeting, little brother went and socialized and talked-business with big brother’s main competitor (China). If the US is to secure the oil resources in Canada in the long-term – resources that most US economists have assumed to be part of long-term American oil supply, then we may have to take a more assertive role when dictating policy to our northern neighbors. The US must let Canada know that they are playing with fire when they start selling off North American oil to the Chinese, because the US may need that supply of oil to remain competitive with China in the future. Although the issue does not warrant rolling M1 Abrams tanks into Ottawa, the US may want to consider exerting economic and political pressure on Canada if it continues to do business with China (like selling them Yellowcake Uranium) that runs contrary to US global interests. US officials should monitor the situation closely.
  • 2012-04-28 15:43:06
mary david
mary david From: Mrs. Mary David This mail may be a surprise to you because you did not give me the permission to do so and neither do you know me but before I tell you about myself I want you to please forgive me for sending this mail without your permission. I am writing this letter in confidence believing that if it is the will of God for you to help me and my family, God almighty will bless and reward you abundantly. I need an honest and trust worthy person like you to entrust this huge transfer project unto. My name is Mrs. Mary David, The Branch Manager of a Financial Institution. I am a Ghanaian married with 3 kids. I am writing to solicit your assistance in the transfer of US$7,500,000.00 Dollars. This fund is the excess of what my branch in which I am the manager made as profit last year (i.e. 2011 financial year). I have already submitted an annual report for that year to my head office in Accra-Ghana as I have watched with keen interest as they will never know of this excess. I have since, placed this amount of US$7,500,000.00 Dollars on an Escrow Coded account without a beneficiary (Anonymous) to avoid trace. As an officer of the bank, I cannot be directly connected to this money thus I am impelled to request for your assistance to receive this money into your bank account on my behalf. I agree that 40% of this money will be for you as a foreign partner, in respect to the provision of a foreign account, and 60% would be for me. I do need to stress that there are practically no risk involved in this. It's going to be a bank-to-bank transfer. All I need from you is to stand as the original depositor of this fund so that the fund can be transferred to your account. If you accept this offer, I will appreciate your timely response to me. This is why and only reason why I contacted you, I am willing to go into partnership investment with you owing to your wealth of experience, So please if you are interested to assist on this venture kindly contact me back for a brief discussion on how to proceed. All correspondence must be via my private E-mail (marydavid114@yahoo.com) for obvious security reasons. Best regards, Mrs. Mary David.
  • 2012-02-22 11:24:34

Showing all Comments

Sort by:
  • Oldest
  • Newest
mary david
mary david From: Mrs. Mary David This mail may be a surprise to you because you did not give me the permission to do so and neither do you know me but before I tell you about myself I want you to please forgive me for sending this mail without your permission. I am writing this letter in confidence believing that if it is the will of God for you to help me and my family, God almighty will bless and reward you abundantly. I need an honest and trust worthy person like you to entrust this huge transfer project unto. My name is Mrs. Mary David, The Branch Manager of a Financial Institution. I am a Ghanaian married with 3 kids. I am writing to solicit your assistance in the transfer of US$7,500,000.00 Dollars. This fund is the excess of what my branch in which I am the manager made as profit last year (i.e. 2011 financial year). I have already submitted an annual report for that year to my head office in Accra-Ghana as I have watched with keen interest as they will never know of this excess. I have since, placed this amount of US$7,500,000.00 Dollars on an Escrow Coded account without a beneficiary (Anonymous) to avoid trace. As an officer of the bank, I cannot be directly connected to this money thus I am impelled to request for your assistance to receive this money into your bank account on my behalf. I agree that 40% of this money will be for you as a foreign partner, in respect to the provision of a foreign account, and 60% would be for me. I do need to stress that there are practically no risk involved in this. It's going to be a bank-to-bank transfer. All I need from you is to stand as the original depositor of this fund so that the fund can be transferred to your account. If you accept this offer, I will appreciate your timely response to me. This is why and only reason why I contacted you, I am willing to go into partnership investment with you owing to your wealth of experience, So please if you are interested to assist on this venture kindly contact me back for a brief discussion on how to proceed. All correspondence must be via my private E-mail (marydavid114@yahoo.com) for obvious security reasons. Best regards, Mrs. Mary David.
  • 2012-02-22 11:24:34
Kelan Smith
Kelan Smith It is important to consider that Canada is not the “51st state”, nor is it “America Junior”, as many folks in the United States have come to think of it. We have become accustomed to Canada serving US economic and political interests, however, I do believe that as the United States’ global economic position evens out with the rest of the world (and as Canada’s does as well), we will see Canada acting in an increasingly independent fashion. Canada has the natural resources to be an incredibly powerful country due to their huge tracts of land and sparse population density – they are just now beginning to capitalize on that fact from an international export standpoint as China begins to wheel-and-deal with them, without US involvement. The US is partly to blame for Canada going ahead and dealing with China alone in an economic capacity. The US (big brother) left Canada (little brother) out of the Trans-Pacific Trade Partnership (TPP), so we should not be so surprised that while the US was at their TPP club meeting, little brother went and socialized and talked-business with big brother’s main competitor (China). If the US is to secure the oil resources in Canada in the long-term – resources that most US economists have assumed to be part of long-term American oil supply, then we may have to take a more assertive role when dictating policy to our northern neighbors. The US must let Canada know that they are playing with fire when they start selling off North American oil to the Chinese, because the US may need that supply of oil to remain competitive with China in the future. Although the issue does not warrant rolling M1 Abrams tanks into Ottawa, the US may want to consider exerting economic and political pressure on Canada if it continues to do business with China (like selling them Yellowcake Uranium) that runs contrary to US global interests. US officials should monitor the situation closely.
  • 2012-04-28 15:43:06